New website for research on freedom of expression

June 23 2017

This week Fritt Ord is relaunching its website at ytringsfrihet.no. The website features all the major freedom of expression surveys carried out by Fritt Ord, as well as information about events and news items related to new research in this field.

The Foundation is interested in surveying the position of freedom of expression in different areas of society. The formidable research project entitled ‘The status of freedom of expression in Norway’, also known as the Fritt Ord Foundation Monitoring Project, commenced in 2013 and explored the topic in two phases, from 2013 to 2014 and from 2015 to 2017.

The project was carried out by the Institute for Social Research, along with Fafo, TNS Gallup and the Department of Media and Communication at the University of Oslo as partners. The website ytringsfrihet.no is a repository for all research reports and articles related to the project.

The website also hosts other surveys of freedom of expression supported by Fritt Ord, including The Freedom of Expression Barometer, conducted in 2013 by TNS Gallup and commissioned by Fritt Ord and UNESCO’s Norwegian expert group for freedom of expression.

About the Status of Freedom of Expression in Norway

One of the key findings from the Status of Freedom of Expression in Norway’s first project period in 2013-2014, was that the general public draws up normative boundaries for the exercise of freedom of expression, and that many are of the opinion that freedom of expression must be balanced against other considerations, e.g. to avoid hurting or insulting others or to avoid appearing racist. Intentions and attitudes to such self-limitation turned out to vary by gender, age, political point of view, etc. The project resulted in a final general report and in several sub-reports.

The Status of Free Speech in the Public Sphere in Norway 2015-2017 is a continuation of the broad-based study conducted in 2013-2014. In the second term of this project, researchers delved more deeply into the processes by which limits are set for what can and cannot be said in the public sphere in Norway. This project period culminated in the book Boundary Struggles: Contestations of Free Speech in the Norwegian Public Sphere (Cappelen Damm Academic, 2017), which is freely available and can be read here.

News

What's happening in Georgia?

September 22 2025

Monday 29 September 2025 at 6.30–8 pm at Vega Scene, Oslo

“While art is often relegated to the bottom of financial priorities, it paradoxically becomes the first target of dictators.”

Fritt Ord invites you to a presentation of a hyper-relevant, upcoming documentary film “Untitled” from Georgia and a conversation with two film directors about the political developments in the country in collaboration with Oslo Dokumentarkino, Stray Dogs Norway, Viken Filmsenter and the Norwegian Film Federation. Journalist Ingerid Salvesen is the moderator. For the safety of the filmmakers, we will not mention their names in advance.

“This documentary is not for the faint of heart” New grants awarded in September 2025.

September 19 2025

Integral Film has been given grant for the production of the documentary “Rehearsal for Justice” by Palestinian filmmaker Dalia AlKury. “The film is not for the faint of heart,” says the director. See all the projects that received funding in September 2025.

Free Media Awards for 2025

September 9 2025

The Fritt Ord Foundation and the ZEIT Stiftung Bucerius hereby announce that the Free Media Awards for 2025 will be presented to media outlets and journalists from Ukraine, Georgia, Hungary, Russia, Belarus and Azerbaijan

Greater diversity among journalists results in greater diversity among sources

September 2 2025

A recently published report reveals biases in who is allowed to participate in the public debate. According to a new report from Retriever commissioned by the Fritt Ord Foundation, men who have Nordic names dominate both as sources and journalists in Norwegian media. Women, younger people and people with foreign names are less likely to be included. This is true both as interviewees and as authors of articles. That being said, greater diversity among journalists results in greater diversity among sources.