The Freedom to Be Racist?

June 8 2016

On Wednesday June 8, 6 p.m.-8 p.m. the Fritt Ord Foundation and the Institute for Social Research are hosting a debate on freedom of expression and racism at the Fritt Ord offices in Uranienborgveien 2, 0258 Oslo.

We have invited political scientist Erik Bleich to talk about his book The Freedom to be Racist?, in which he explores the ways liberal democracies like France, Germany and the US have sought to balance freedom of expression and racism.

Comments by Mohamed Abdi, columnist for Morgenbladet and Anne Sender, secretary general of The Council for Religious and Life Stance Communities. The conversation is moderated by Arnfinn H. Midtbøen, researcher at the Institute for Social Research.

Liberal democracies strive to preserve as much freedom as possible for their citizens. They also work hard to combat the racism that has blighted so many of their historical records. But what happens when people use their liberal democratic freedoms to engage in racism? What do societies do when two of their most cherished values collide?

In his wide-ranging and thought-provoking book, The Freedom to Be Racist? (Oxford University Press, 2011), Bleich explores policies that the United States, Britain, France, Germany and other liberal democracies have implemented when forced to choose between preserving freedom and combating racism.

Bleich’s comparative historical approach reveals that each country has struggled to strike a balance between protecting freedom and reducing racism, and that the outcomes have been starkly different across time and place. Building on these observations, he argues that we should pay close attention to the specific context and to the likely effects of any policy we implement, and that any response should be proportionate to the level of harm the racism inflicts.

This event is part of the research project “Status of freedom of expression in Norway” which is being headed by the Institute for Social Research on commission for the Fritt Ord Foundation. Read more about the initiative here.

Erik Bleich is Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College, Vermont. Bleich has written articles on topics such as hate crimes, political violence, Islamophobia, ethnic riots, immigration and integration, and the legacies of colonialism on contemporary policymaking. Besides The Freedom to Be Racist?, he is the author of Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s (Cambridge University Press, 2003), and the editor and a contributor to the book Muslims and the State in the Post-9/11 West (Routledge, 2010).

News

Mykhailo Tkach

Ukrainian, Georgian, Armenian, Russian and Belarusian journalists and media to receive five Free Media Awards for 2026

September 3 2026

This year’s prize laureates for the Free Media Awards from the Fritt Ord Foundation and Zeit Stiftung Bucerius are:
The investigative journalist Mykhailo Tkach from Ukraine
The investigative media outlet iFact from Georgia
The online media Factor TV from Armenia
The online media Verstka from Russia (in exile)
The journalist and media director Andrei Aliaksandrau from Belarus (imprisoned)

Fritt Ord's grants for master’s degrees

August 30 2026

Is your master’s project about freedom of expression, social debate or journalism? If so, you can apply for a student grant from the Fritt Ord Foundation.

The Freedom of Expression Foundation Tribute 2026

August 18 2026

The rap duo Karpe has been awarded the Freedom of Expression Foundation Tribute for giving voice to the experiences of many young people from minority backgrounds. Through the language of rap, they are expanding the space for the expression of identity and belonging.

The 2025/26 Monitor survey

June 17 2026

The Fritt Ord Foundation and the Institute for Social Research (ISF) invite you to the launch of a report and a subsequent discussion on Monday, 8 June 2026, from 9.00 to 11.00 am, at Fritt Ord’s premises at Uranienborgveien 2 in Oslo.

Where do people draw the line when it comes to freedom of expression, and what do they believe to be the greatest threats to an informed debate at a time characterised by unrest, crises and international conflicts? Do they feel there is sufficient diversity of opinion and enough room for divergent viewpoints? And how do people assess access to truthful and relevant information in a media landscape featuring new formats, new voices and artificial intelligence?