Artists' accountability in public and in the political sphere. Follow up of the principles involved in the Handke debate

January 24 2015

On Saturday, 24 January 2015, the Fritt Ord Foundation will examine in more detail the principle aspects of the debate about the controversial award one of the world’s most coveted theatre prizes, the International Ibsen Award, to Peter Handke. The conference is intended to shed light on the relationship between art, politics and freedom of expression in a broad sense.

The comprehensive, intense Handke debate in 2014 was one of the most important debates about art, politics and freedom of expression that we have seen in Norway for quite some time, and it is just one of several backdrops for the conference. The increasingly revitalised Hamsun debate is another, in addition to a number of other Norwegian and international discussions of recent decades. They reveal that artists have no more profound political understanding or more astute political judgment than most members of society. Meanwhile, they often have extremely good access to the general public, and they are often accorded respect and credibility based on their position as artists.

Each lecture will last for 30 minutes, to be followed by 30 minutes of discussion.

Date: Saturday, 24 January 2015, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Venue: The Wergeland Room at the House of Literature in Oslo

PROGRAMME

Welcome and introduction by Chair of the Fritt Ord Foundation’s Board Georg Fr. Rieber-Mohn.

10 a.m. – 11 a.m.
Here. Here in this world
Kaja Schjerven Mollerin, PhD fellow in literary science at the University of Oslo, former editor of ‘The Window’.

11.00 a.m. – 12.00 p.m.
What does a writer know that an ordinary person does not know?
Thomas Steinfeld,
former editor of Süddeutsche Zeitung and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, currently Venice correspondent for Süddeutsche Zeitung and a professor at the University of Lucerne.

12.00 p.m. – 1.00 p.m. Lunch

1.00 p.m. – 2.00 p.m.
Who is drawing up the boundaries today? About art, terror and freedom of expression
Hilde Sandvik,
Culture and Debate editor at Bergens Tidende and author.

2.00 p.m. – 3.00 p.m.
Artistic creation as subversive activity. Should a democracy attach conditions to artists’ freedom of expression?
Arne Ruth,
former editor-in-chief of Dagens Nyheter (News of the Day) and former Fritt Ord Foundation professor, author.

The conference languages are Norwegian and Swedish. The conference will be moderated by executive director of the Fritt Ord Foundation.

Admission is free of charge. Registration at handke@fritt-ord.no

News

Mykhailo Tkach

Ukrainian, Georgian, Armenian, Russian and Belarusian journalists and media to receive five Free Media Awards for 2026

September 3 2026

This year’s prize laureates for the Free Media Awards from the Fritt Ord Foundation and Zeit Stiftung Bucerius are:
The investigative journalist Mykhailo Tkach from Ukraine
The investigative media outlet iFact from Georgia
The online media Factor TV from Armenia
The online media Verstka from Russia (in exile)
The journalist and media director Andrei Aliaksandrau from Belarus (imprisoned)*

Fritt Ord's grants for master’s degrees

August 30 2026

Is your master’s project about freedom of expression, social debate or journalism? If so, you can apply for a student grant from the Fritt Ord Foundation.

The Freedom of Expression Foundation Tribute 2026

August 18 2026

The rap duo Karpe has been awarded the Freedom of Expression Foundation Tribute for giving voice to the experiences of many young people from minority backgrounds. Through the language of rap, they are expanding the space for the expression of identity and belonging.

The 2025/26 Monitor survey

June 17 2026

The Fritt Ord Foundation and the Institute for Social Research (ISF) invite you to the launch of a report and a subsequent discussion on Monday, 8 June 2026, from 9.00 to 11.00 am, at Fritt Ord’s premises at Uranienborgveien 2 in Oslo.

Where do people draw the line when it comes to freedom of expression, and what do they believe to be the greatest threats to an informed debate at a time characterised by unrest, crises and international conflicts? Do they feel there is sufficient diversity of opinion and enough room for divergent viewpoints? And how do people assess access to truthful and relevant information in a media landscape featuring new formats, new voices and artificial intelligence?